Ang dating daan catholic answers who is dating mark harmon

But they lifted the texts out of context so this resulted not just in a defective view of Christ but an aberrant view of God as well.

By quoting Titus 1:2 and Hebrews , the ADD thought they could dismiss the Biblical teachings on the nature of God (like Jeremiah and Luke ).

In 1922, eight years after the founding of the Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ, hereon referred to as INC), minister Nicholas Perez broke away from it due to doctrinal differences.

ang dating daan catholic answers-55

The Bible itself labels a teaching “false” if it goes against the Word of God (1 John 4:1-3; 2 Peter 2:1). In their zeal to debunk the teachings of the INC, it appears that the ADD swung to the other extreme. The ADD, on the other hand, teaches that Jesus is God, not man.[7] This went against the Biblical teaching on the humanity of Christ (Rom , 18-19; 1 Cor ; 1 Tim 2:5).To make it easy to remember, the author devised the acronym C. These verses clearly state that our Lord Jesus only assumed the form of man. Therefore, to teach that our Lord Jesus Christ is a man is a big mistake.He is not a man by nature; He only assumed the form of a man. [8]Why did John said [sic] that our Lord Jesus was a man?In other words, He lived like a man.[9]There are preachers who think that, through hermeneutics they can rightfully understand the Bible. They do not contribute in developing correct interpretation and understanding of the Bible.[10]But, because the Bible is not only the words of God but also of man, reading is an interpretation by itself: “From the standpoint of the Bible as literature, the simplest error of reading is the failure to consider the immediate context of the verse or passage in question.”[11] In reading a passage, there is a need to properly interpret the meaning of words.How a word is used in its context determines its meaning.

Leave a Reply